Managing Nitrogen Topdress in 2022


In most areas of the southern region, 2022 is shaping up to be another good winter crop season. Soil moisture profiles are full, (saturated in some areas!) and the rainfall outlook appears to be positive. However, after two big nutrient removal seasons soil-nitrogen levels are low. A tailored nitrogen strategy will be needed to optimise grain yield and returns.


Click here to download this article



This year, growers and agronomists will need to ensure cereals and canola have an adequate supply of nitrogen (N). This means managing nitrogen application rates with application timings and placement methods to maximise nitrogen use efficiency.

Figures 1 and 2: Grain phosphorus and nitrogen removal from the 2020 (canola) and 2021 (wheat) harvests at the IPF Long Term Nitrogen x Phosphorus Trial, Glenelg NSW, established 2007.

Nitrogen prices are high but fortunately potential grain prices are high as well. This combination means fertiliser is still a good investment. A similar quantity of grain is required to cover the investment in nitrogen and phosphorus when compared to seasons with a combination of low fertiliser and grain prices.

Nitrogen is essential for dry matter production, shoot density and potential yield in cereals. When crops begin to mature, nitrogen within the plant is redirected to developing grains. Carbohydrates are then deposited within the grain, and it is the level of carbohydrates that determine grain size and yield. This dilution of nitrogen in grain also determines final grain protein levels.

In short dry springs, crop yields are reduced because they are unable to fill each grain, and the percentage of grain protein is much higher and often grain size is smaller. Longer soft finishes to the growing season, result in crops filling grain to their full capacity. With this scenario where adequate nitrogen is not available to maintain a higher yield and protein the dilution of nitrogen levels in the grain may result in low grain protein levels.

2021 Wheat IPF Glenelg long term N x P trial site

The idea of using grain protein concentration to assess the likelihood of N responsiveness wheat in cropping systems in South Australia was described 50 years ago (Russell, 1963). The work suggested that yield responses were most likely when grain protein concentration was <11.4% (McDonald & Hooper, 2013). This is supported in trial results from the IPF Long Term Trail at Glenelg in Central NSW (Figure 3), where yield response to nitrogen plateaus in the 11-12% protein range and protein % continues to increase with additional nitrogen.

Figure 3: Yield and protein response to rates of phosphorus and nitrogen in 2013 at the Incitec Pivot Fertilisers Long Term Nitrogen x Phosphorus Trial, Glenelg NSW

In winter cereals it can be a juggling act to manage additional nitrogen inputs between pre-plant and booting and, in irrigated and high rainfall systems, though to flowering in order to achieve the targeted yield, grain size and protein results.

Throughout this process it is critical that nitrogen is identified as the only limitation. As Table 1 shows there are many other things that will affect crop yield and protein potential.

Table 1: Factors affecting crop yield and protein potential

Climate Factors

Soil Factors

Crop Factors

Rainfall quantity

Organic matter

Crop species

Rainfall distribution



Air temperature


Planting date

Relative Humidity

Cation Exchange Capacity

Seed rate and row spacing

Light quantity

Slope and topography

Seed quality

Light intensity

Soil temperature


Light duration


Water availability




Wind velocity

Soil depth


Wind distribution

Water holding capacity


CO2 concentration



Adapted from “Soil Fertility and Fertilizer Management” Havlin, Beaton, Tisdale and Nelson 6th edition.


The first step in planning nitrogen applications is a simple budgeting process to assess nitrogen demand – the nitrogen required to grow a target yield and protein. Once you know the N demand, you can determine the amount of fertiliser/nitrogen required.

Estimating existing nitrogen supply

There are several tools available to advisers to help determine the existing nitrogen supply, such as reviewing paddock fertiliser and crop histories, deep soil nitrogen test, in-crop NDVI, shoot density. The best decisions are made using reputable information collected from a range of sources.

Paddock history

Information such as previous crop yield, previous grain protein levels, crop rotation, fallow weed control, soil moisture levels, seasonal conditions and expectations can all help guide topdressing decisions.

For example, where paddocks produced wheat crops in 2021 with less than 10.5 to 11%, it suggests nitrogen supply was limiting. There may be higher soil nitrogen levels in 2022 in those paddocks in the rotation coming off a legume pasture or pulse crop phase in 2021.

Relying solely on paddock history information can be misleading at times, as no direct measurements are taken. The guiding ‘4R’ principles of the right source, rate, time, and place of fertiliser requires knowledge of both crop demand and soil N supply. Seasonal conditions remain the primary driver of crop demand for N in dryland cropping systems and to a significant extent also fertiliser use efficiency.

Deep soil nitrogen tests

Pre-plant deep soil nitrogen test results are an excellent resource for nitrogen management. One of the disadvantages in low soil nitrogen paddocks if additional nitrogen has not been applied at seeding is there may be a requirement for early topdressed nitrogen at mid-tillering to establish the desired target shoot density by GS30.

Monitor the paddocks that you know (either by deep N soil test results or paddock history) to have low soil nitrogen levels. Don’t always wait until GS30 to assess crop performance, early nitrogen may be required to achieve the desired target shot density by GS30. The application of 15 to 30 kg N/ha may be required to stimulate additional tillers. Easy N® through streamers or dribble bars is ideally suited to this scenario with accurate placement, timely application and potentially less volatilisation losses than urea on alkaline soils.

Sampling in-crop can also play a role where deep N test weren’t taken pre-plant. When sampling post planting, be careful to avoid any banded pre-plant nitrogen or starter nitrogen fertilisers.

In-crop deep nitrogen test results should be used in conjunction with the percentage of total nitrogen in above ground dry matter, especially where dry matter is above 1000 kg/ha, to calculate the total available nitrogen.



Nitrogen applications before GS30 can increase tiller numbers and dry matter, leading to yield increases. The greatest demand for N is when the leaf area is expanding rapidly, and the crop is growing most rapidly.

Nitrogen applications between GS31 – GS37 correspond to the period of stem elongation and at this time peak growth rates can be of the order of 200 kg/ha/day and crops can be accumulating N at 2-3 kg N/ha/day (McDonald, 2013). Some carry-over of nitrogen into grain protein may occur.

When nitrogen is applied after GS59, it is generally to manipulate grain protein and maintain yields in above average seasons. Nitrogen use efficiency is reduced at these later stages of application. Conditions and likely returns need to be assessed carefully.

Remember that it is only when the yield potential has been reached that additional nitrogen can contribute to higher grain protein levels.

Figure 4: Typical grain yield and protein responses to nitrogen in wheat. Source: Incitec Pivot Fertilisers